If Nigeria is to replicate the success of India in software
development and outsourcing, there has to be a recalibration of the way
we apply copyright law. Our survey reveals that for every ten Nigerian
software users, eight use non-genuine or pirated copies.
The most widely used pirated software include the Microsoft
Office Suite (85%), Microsoft’s Operating System (91%) and various
software used for editing pictures (40%) (See chart 1).
Furthermore,
students are more likely to copy and share pirated software than any
other class of software users in Nigeria. Though they have an assortment
of software they typically do not buy originals. They meet their
software needs by copying from friends (63%), buying non-genuine copies
from shops (14%), downloading trial versions and cracking them (20%), or
buying originals (3%).
The general population is not much
different; the minor difference lies in the fact that a number of
working individuals get original software from their work places. Our
research also revealed that specalised, professional software,
especially for fields like facility management, accounting and
engineering are less likely to be pirated than general use software.
It
is gladdening to note that most of our respondents indicate that they
prefer originals because of the many challenges with security checks and
other difficulties they experience with non-genuine copies.
They
also indicated readiness to buy original copies At Computer Village,
Nigeria’s busiest computer and software market, an original copy of the
Microsoft’s Office Suite (home premium, single user) costs between
N15,000-N20,000, while a pirated copy costs between N150-N200. An
original copy of Microfit for Windows, an econometrics software, costs
N130,000 and sometimes you need to place an order before you get a copy,
but a pirated version costs just N700 or less. But pirated copies often
fail during installation, but that has not deterred those who buy.
Our
survey revealed that for every single shop that offers original
software there are five others which offer alternative pirated copies at
Computer Village. Some shops even sell both. When we spoke to pirated
copy marketers, most saw no reason why their trade should be interfered
with; they attributed their persistence in the trade to the low capital
required for the business and high patronage.
But different
institutions are working to see that the tide is reversed. Earlier this
year, Microsoft (which has suffered most of the piracy, according to our
survey) organized a roundtable discussion to commemorate World
Intellectual Property Day; the gathering drew attention to how the use
of non-genuine software threatens legitimate businesses and creates a
negative impact on both global and local economies.
Microsoft is
not alone in its condemnation of piracy. The Institute of Software
Practitioners of Nigeria (ISPON), a body set up to facilitate business
and trade in software and related services, has as part of it mandate to
a goal to “develop rules and regulations that will discourage software
piracy and ensure that software products and services are used in
accordance with intellectual property rights”. How far the body will go
is ultimately a function of government’s commitment and support through
effective legislation.
There is business intelligence in all of
this data. Over half of respondents say if prices were lower they would
change (53%) to originals, nine percent stated that they would switch to
originals if there is regulation of intellectual property which
punishes violation, while 24 percent say they will buy originals if
fakes have negative impact on their computers (see chart 2). All of
these factors are variables which a proactive software producer can
creatively affect to suit its markets.
No comments:
Post a Comment